Clark v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Doyle v. Ohio · Israel Alicea Rosado v. Ramon Garcia Santiago · Bourque v. Powell Electrical Manufacturing Co. · Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“working conditions which rendered his subsequent resignation involuntary. The court agreed that defendant's actions violated Title VII. It rejected plaintiff's claim of constructive discharge, however, concluding that there was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Marsh“such opportunities. 489 F.Supp. at 1240. That the expected advancement failed to materialize was not due to any deficiencies in plaintiff's qualifications, the court concluded, but to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Marsh“489 F.Supp. at 1246. The court also determined that OEPGR staff participating in the program were subject to systemic discrimination because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Marsh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.