214 Wis. 2d 541 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 141 Wis. 2d 81 - State v. Michels · 96 Wis. 2d 106 - State v. Mendoza · 125 Wis. 2d 170 - In Interest of CDM · 176 Wis. 2d 304 - State v. Skamfer · State v. Brill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he deprivation of liberty . . . must occur as a result of a violation of the law. ... [A] prisoner is a person confined under authority of law and pursuant to a penological or a correctional objective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We considered our statutes to define prisoner as a person 'who has been confined as a means of enforcing the law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[o]ne who is deprived of his liberty; one who is against his will kept in confinement or custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.