Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 W. Va. 1 - State v. Scott

214 W. Va. 1 - State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 154 W. Va. 397 - State Ex Rel. Carson v. Wood · 210 W. Va. 490 - Walker v. Doe · 213 W. Va. 457 - State Ex Rel. Medical Assurance of West Virginia, Inc. v. Recht · Wanstreet v. Bordenkircher · 166 W. Va. 523 - Wanstreet v. Bordenkircher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a criminal defendant has been placed on probation after successfully completing a program of rehabilitation at a young adult offender center under the Youthful Offenders Act, W. Va.Code, 25-4-1 to -12, and such probation is subsequently revoked, pursuant to W. Va.Code, 25-4-6 [2001] the circuit court's sentencing order must credit the defendant with time spent in incarceration in such a manner that the defendant's date of eligibility for parole is the same as if the defendant had not been committed to a young adult offender center and subsequently placed on probation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]n inmate under two or more consecutive sentences shall be allowed good time as if the several sentences, when the maximum terms thereof are added together, were all one sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[t]he simplest way to correct the order might be to allocate 365 days toward the first, uttering count, and the remaining 202 days toward the transporting count.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.