214 W. Va. 624 - State v. Hinchman’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · 194 W. Va. 138 - Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L. · 194 W. Va. 3 - State v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In those situations where there has been no arrest or indictment, the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is not implicated. Yet, the prosecution may have substantially delayed the institution of criminal proceedings causing prejudice to the defendant by way of loss of witnesses or other evidence. In this situation, the Fifth Amendment due process standard is utilized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In reviewing challenges to the findings and conclusions of the circuit court, we apply a two-prong deferential standard of review. We review the final order and the ultimate disposition under an abuse of discretion standard, and we review the circuit court’s underlying factual findings under a . clearly erroneous standard. Questions of law are subject to a de novo review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.