Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

215 A.D.2d 429

Elenson v. Wax

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1995-05-08

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2007

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-05-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, conversion, and corporate waste, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.), dated April 9, 1993, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

¶2Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

¶3It is axiomatic that a shareholder has no individual cause of action to recover damages for a wrong against a corporation, even if that shareholder loses the value of his investment or incurs personal liability in an effort to maintain the solvency of the corporation (see, Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951). Allegations of mismanagement or diversion of assets by officers or directors for their own enrichment, without more, plead a wrong to the corporation only, for which a shareholder may sue derivatively but not individually (see, Abrams v Donati, supra).In this case, the majority of the plaintiffs’ claims allege that the individual defendant caused injury to a corporation alleged to be jointly owned by the plaintiff Brian Elenson and the individual defendant. As such, neither of the plaintiffs may maintain these claims individually; they may only sue derivatively.

¶4To the extent that the plaintiffs have asserted nonderivative causes of action, we find that dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) is warranted. Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.

/215/ad2d/429 · .json · Public domain