Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Ala. 304 - Paschall v. Sharp

Paschall v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2009

15 state decisions

40192619301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McMillan v. Aiken · Parker v. Wilson · Rush v. McDonnell · Mobile County v. White · Gardiner v. Solomon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Any person under 16 years of age is conclusively presumed incompetent to drive an automobile on the public highways of Alabama; and any person who allows such a vehicle to be operated by a person, a minor, under 16 years of age, upon the public highways of this state, unaccompanied by an adult person, is guilty of negligence as a matter of law." (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.