Jett v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably Voehl v. Indemnity Ins Co of North America (1933), Barnett v. Britling Cafeteria Co. (1932)
2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co. · Donovan's Case · Swanson v. Latham · Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co. · Ex Parte Terry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘‘Personal Injuries, etc. — Without otherwise affecting either the meaning or interpretation of the abridged clause, injuries by an accident arising out of and in the course of Ms employment, it is hereby declared: Not to cover workmen except while engaged in, on, or about the premises where their services are being performed, or where their service requires their presence as a part of such service at the time of the accident, and during the hours of service as such workmen. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ ‘In general it may be said that the act was intended to apply in cases where the relation of master and servant exists.’ ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wooten v. Roden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.