Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Ark. 463 - Cross v. Pharr

Cross v. Pharr’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2008

12 state decisions

601949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Black v. Black · Mosley v. Mohawk Lumber Co. · First National Bank v. Somers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless something appears in the will indicating a different purpose, it is ordinarily presumed that the trustor intended the beneficiary to be supported and maintained from estate income, or as is sometimes the case, from sale of a part of the corpus. See 101 A. L. R., 1461 et seq.; Restatement of the Law of Trusts, § 128, Comment “e”;. Scott on Trusts, p. 672.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.