Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Cal. 714 - Smith v. O'Donnell

Smith v. O'Donnell’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
5
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably 25 Cal. 2d 486 - Ybarra v. Spangard (1944), 45 Cal. 2d 811 - Seneris v. Haas (1955)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 48 state decisions

21019321940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Judson v. Giant Powder Co. · Best Park & Amusement Co. v. Rollins · O'Connor v. Mennie · Champagne v. A. HamBurger & Sons, Inc. · O'Callaghan v. Dellwood Park Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. That Hanson Aviation, Inc. undertook either expressly or by course of conduct generally and for all persons indifferently to carry and deliver them for hire, so long as it had room.” 1”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the craft [an airplane] be employed as a common carrier vehicle, it is not a reason for applying different rules of liability to say that it and the industry is new. If too new, a conclusion we think unfounded, should not its owner either decline to use it for the purpose, or assume the liability incident to the use to which he puts it?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Why is not this rule (the rule of liability applying to common carriers) applicable to those operating cars upon a scenic railway such as the one here in question? The passengers carried therein are subject to great risk to life and limb. The steep inclines, sharp curves, and great speed necessarily are sources of peril.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.