215 Cal. App. 2d 627 - Kyne v. Eustice’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 245 Cal. App. 2d 80 - Thornton v. Rhoden (1966), 69 Cal. 2d 461 - Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co. (1968)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 49 Cal. 2d 210 - Spellens v. Spellens · Buxbom v. Smith · Wells v. Lloyd · Tranchina v. Arcinas · Peters v. Peters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantially affect[ed] the rights and obligations of the appellant as to result in a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'was sufficiently prejudicial to justify a reversal.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.