Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 CONN 231 - State v. Weinberg

State v. Weinberg’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

196
cited by 196 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

196 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 196 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Robinson (1993), State v. Prioleau (1995)

196 state decisions

11201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Smith v. Phillips · State v. Golding · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Rushen v. Spain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 196 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Probable cause to search exists if: (1) there is probable cause to believe that the particular items sought to be seized are connected with criminal activity or will assist in a particular apprehension or conviction. . . and (2) there is probable cause to believe that the items sought to be seized will be found in the place to be searched.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the Constitution does not require a new trial every time a juror has been placed in a potentially compromising situation . . . [because] it is virtually impossible to shield jurors from every contact or influence that might theoretically affect their vote.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “he engaged in verbal and nonverbal conduct, such as changing both his personal appearance and his car's appearance and offering unsolicited details to the police, that can fairly be inferred to have been influenced by the criminal act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.