Riggleman’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2501
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Armstrong v. United States · United States v. Munsey Trust Co. · Joseph Skilken & Co. v. City of Toledo · United States v. Dickinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * [I]n the event that the Government should fail to remove the personal property from the farm in a reasonable time after the plaintiffs grant it permission to enter upon the land for such purpose, the plaintiffs may seek leave of court to amend their petition in accordance with Rule 39 to state any cause of action that may accrue from a refusal of the Government to remove the property after permission is granted. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.