Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 F.1d 129 - In re O'Brien

In re O'Brien’s Empirical Analysis

215 F. 129 · 1914

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1934
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1934

1 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

30191419201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Metcalf Brothers Company v. Benjamin Barker Jr · Whitney v. Wenman · Lauter Co. v. Isenreath · Lauter & Co. v. O'Toole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That trustees shall * * * collect and reduce to money the property of the estate for which they are trustees, under the direction of the court, and close up the estate as expeditiously as is compatible with the best interests of the parties in interest; and such trustees, as to all property in the custody •or coming into the custody of the bankruptcy court, shall be deemed vested with all the rights, remedies, and powers of a creditor holding a lien by legal or equitable proceedings thereon; and also, as to all property not in the custody of the bankruptcy court, shall be deemed vested with all the rights, remedies, and powers of a judgment creditor holding an execution duly returned unsatisfied.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The effect of the amendment of 1910 is to place the trustee, so far as his right to attack the validity of the instrument in question is concerned, in the same position as a judgment creditor and to invest him with the same, rights. As the conditional bill of sale would, under the state law, be void as against a judgment creditor, it is likewise void as against the trustee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.