Pino v. Nicolls’s Empirical Analysis
215 F.2d 237 · 1954
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2015 · most notably Pollard v. United States (1957), SILVA-TREVINO (2015)
53 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kercheval v. United States · Korematsu v. United States · Commonwealth v. Lockwood · Commonwealth v. John Dowdican's Bail
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the crime in its general nature is one which in common usage would be classified as a crime involving moral turpitude, neither the administrative officials in a deportation proceeding nor the courts on review of administrative action are under the oppressive burden of taking and considering evidence of the circumstances of a particular offense so as to determine whether there were extenuating circumstances which might relieve the offender of the stigma of moral obliquity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“in the interest of a uniform application of the federal statute, the meaning of the word 'convicted' is a federal question....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. ANDRADE · Holzapfel v. Wyrsch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.