Farricielli v. Holbrook’s Empirical Analysis
215 F.3d 241 · 2000
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Bouboulis v. Transport Workers Union (2006), Fulton v. Goord (2009)
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Papasan v. Allain · Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at the Property without proper characterization of that material. 15 DEP has prohibited Farricielli, or others acting on Farricielli's behalf, from inspecting and, as warranted, from preventing shipments of improper and unlawful wastes onto the Property for disposal, wastes which may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to health and the environment. 16 These allegations do not specify the provisions of RCRA that the Commissioner is alleged to have violated. 17 On appeal, Farricielli explains that the Commissioner's actions violated the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“RCRA clearly contemplates that aggrieved citizens may bring suit to enforce its provisions where applicable. Section 6972 states that "any person may commence a civil action on its own behalf ... against any person, including the United States any other governmental instrumentality or agency, to the extent permitted by the [E]leventh [A]mendment to the Constitution" to redress violations of RCRA. As this language makes clear, however, RCRA does not abrogate Eleventh Amendment immunity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“2 In February 1998, Q Group stipulated to payment of a $ 550,000 penalty, and judgment was entered pursuant to the settlement by order of Judge Aurigemma, Connecticut Superior Court. 3 Farricielli has since filed a third amended complaint in this action, naming as an additional plaintiff his company Quinnnipiack Real Estate and Development Corporation. 4 At least one court has concluded that the legislative history of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.