In Re: 1997 Grand Jury United States of America’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2023
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Robinson · United States v. Santoro · United States v. Gilbert · Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Meade · United States v. Garcia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[V]exatious means “ ‘without reasonable or probable cause or excuse.’ ” Gilbert, 198 F.3d at 1298 -99 (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1559 (7th ed.1999)). A frivolous action is “ ‘groundless ... with little prospect of success; often brought to embarrass or annoy the defendant.’ ” Id. (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 668 (6th Ed.1990)). And, bad faith “ ‘is not simply bad judgment or negligence, but rather it implies the conscious doing of a wrong because of dishonest purpose or moral obliquity; ... it contemplates a state of mind affirmatively operating with furtive design or ill will.’ ” Id. (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 139 (6th ed.1990)).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) that the case was pending on or after November 26, 1997, the date of the enactment of the Hyde Amendment; (2) that the case was a criminal case; (3) that the Petitioner was not represented by “assigned counsel paid for by the public;” (4) that the Petitioner was the prevailing party; (5) that the prosecution was “vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith;” (6) that the attorney’s fees were reasonable; and (7) that there are no special circumstances that would make such an award unjust. 1”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.