Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 F.3d 497 - Dilworth v. Johnson

Dilworth v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

215 F.3d 497 · 2000

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
July 2009
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Maleng v. Cook · Flanagan v. Johnson · Fisher v. Texas · Carter v. Estelle · Feliz Talaz Villegas v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'accorded some level of judicial review' by the state courts, it is considered a 'properly filed application' under section 2244(d)(2)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.