Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 F.3d 825 - Kennell v. Gates

Kennell v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis

215 F.3d 825 · 2000

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Davis v. U.S. Bancorp (2004), Livers v. Schenck (2012)

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

200200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Baker v. McCollan · Rochin v. People of California · Million v. Salas · Romero v. Fay · Herman B. Taylor Construction Co. v. David J. Barram, Administrator, General Services Administration

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Admission of evidence showing a telephonic document transfer to the recipient's current telecopier number gives rise to a presumption that notice was duly received by the addressee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an unreasonable or negligent refusal to investigate claims of innocence or mistaken identity of an individual detained pursuant to [a] facially-valid warrant for a few days does not amount to a constitutional violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A jury is permitted to infer that information sent via a reliable means—such as the postal service or a telegram—was received.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.