Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 FRD 2 - Pigford v. Veneman

Pigford v. Veneman’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

12 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hullum v. United States · Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue Service · Coats v. Pierre · In Re 2TheMart. Com, Inc. Securities Litigation · McCorstin v. U. S. Department of Labor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we [attorneys] will treat all participants in the legal process, including counsel ... in a civil, professional, and courteous manner, at all times and in all communications, whether oral or written.... Except within the bounds of fair argument in pleadings or in formal proceedings, we will abstain from disparaging personal remarks or acrimony toward such participants ____We will not bring the profession into disrepute by making unfounded accusations of impropriety or making ad hominem attacks on counsel, and, absent good cause, we will not attribute bad motives or improper conduct to other counsel.... We will not degrade the intelligence, ethics, morals, integrity or personal behavior of others, unless such matters are legitimately at issue in the proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.