Fermin v. Pfizer Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 352 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Makarova v. United States · Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n determining whether a reasonable consumer would be misled by the size of [a product's] packages, the Court must consider the entire context of the [package].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.