MetroPCS v. Devor’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (§ 35 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act)
Relies on 131 Ill. 2d 145 - HPI Health Care Services, Inc. v. Mt. Vernon Hospital, Inc. · 174 Ill. 2d 482 - Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd. · Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & Co. · 209 Ill. 2d 302 - Fritz v. Johnston · Eli Lilly Company v. Natural Answers Incorporated Brian a Feinstein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.