Heath v. Google Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling · 50 Cal. 4th 512 - Reid v. Google, Inc. · 133 S. Ct. 1523 - Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk · Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court may decertify the class and dismiss the opt-in plaintiffs without prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“boilerplate and legal conclusions without support”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“and requiring plaintiffs to merely show a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.