Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Ga. App. 263 - Snelling v. State

215 Ga. App. 263 - Snelling v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 219 Ga. App. 213 - Miller v. State (1995), 246 Ga. App. 109 - Johnson v. State (2000)

25 state decisions

100199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. State · Clifton v. State · Mitchell v. State · Owens v. State · Franklin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny evidence is relevant which logically tends to prove or to disprove a material fact which is at issue in the case, and every act or circumstance serving to elucidate or to throw light upon a material issue or issues is relevant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`The purpose of cross-examination is to provide a searching test of the intelligence, memory, accuracy, and veracity of the witnesses, and it is better for cross-examination to be too free than too much restricted.' [Cit.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “For example, it is purely within the discretion of the [trial] court as to whether the State's counsel should be permitted to lead the witness, or to cross-examine his own witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.