Robert, Ltd. v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 107 Ga. App. 178 - McCarty v. National Life & Accident Insurance · W. R. Grace & Co. v. Mouyal · Liberty Life Insurance Company v. Thomas B. Hartley Construction Company Inc. · 195 Ga. App. 2 - SOUTHERN STORE & RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. Maddox · 174 Ga. App. 682 - Farmer v. Argenta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In effect, the trial court's grant of the directed verdict pretermitted the issues concerning [the applicability of the exculpatory provision or the business judgment rule] and decided the case based upon [Miller's] failure to prove that [the defendants breached fiduciary duties]. Thus, the trial court made no rulings on the [applicability of the exculpatory provision or the business judgment rule] or on the question of ... damages, ... which are issues to be decided by the trial court in the first instance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Lynch“in other circumstances application of [the right for any reason] rule might be warranted, in the posture of this case it is not appropriate for us to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Lynch“we decline to address these issues before the trial court has done so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Lynch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.