Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 ILLAPP3D 930 - Goldberg v. Davis

Goldberg v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gilbert v. First National Bank of Jackson · Dewees v. United States · 84 Ill. 2d 186 - Wilson v. Clark · 53 Ill. 2d 228 - People v. Newbury · 114 Ill. App. 3d 908 - People v. Dace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Except in a criminal proceeding in which the recipient, who is accused in that proceeding, raises the defense of insanity, no record or communication between a therapist and a recipient shall be deemed relevant for purposes of this subsection, except the fact of treatment, the cost of services and the ultimate diagnosis unless the party seeking disclosure of the communication clearly establishes in the trial court a compelling need for its production.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 9172, par. 810(a)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.