Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Kan. 456 - Odom v. State

Odom v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2023

9 state decisions

40197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fouts v. Armstrong Commercial Laundry Distributing Co. · Justice v. Lockett · Commonwealth ex rel. Johnson v. Johnson · Christopher v. Tozer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The issue of denial of a right to a speedy trial is beyond the limited scope of inquiry permissible in an extradition proceeding in an asylum state. That issue may properly be raised only in the demanding state where the accused is being prosecuted. . . (pp. 458-459.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.