State v. Torline’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 1998
2 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pettibone v. United States · State v. Bly · United States v. Truesdell · State v. Brown · State v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) Attempting to influence a judicial officer is communicating with any judicial officer in relation to any matter which is or may be brought before such judge, magistrate, master or juror with intent improperly to influence such officer. “(b) Attempting to influence a judicial officer is a severity level 9, nonperson felony.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Before a verdict of guilty, which has been approved by the district court, may be set aside because of insufficient evidence, it must clearly be shown that upon no hypothesis whatever is there substantial evidence to support the conclusion reached by the district court.” (Syl. ¶ 3.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Thomas · State v. Kane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.