Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Kan. 642 - State v. Bradley

State v. Bradley’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. McDaniel & Owens (1980), State v. Coe (1977)

44 state decisions

18019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002)

Relies on Pettibone v. United States · United States v. Truesdell · Miller v. Hudspeth · Gnadt v. Durr · Flowers, Administratrix v. Marshall, Administrator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Aggravated assault of a law enforcement officer is an aggravated assault, as defined in section 21-3410, committed against a uniformed or properly identified state, county or city law enforcement officer while such officer is engaged in the performance of his duty.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"In section 21-3416 the legislature expressly included scienter as an element of the offense. Therefore, it may be concluded the term ‘knowingly’ would have been used in section 21-3411, if the legislature had intended that scienter also be an element of aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer. Its absence is compelling evidence that the legislature did not intend to require scienter.” 215 Kan. at 647 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Where two statutes are enacted in the same session of the legislature, have the same effective date and relate to public employees performing dangerous and vital duties, having a common purpose to protect that class of persons, they are in pari materia and must be read together when interpreting them.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.