Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Kan. 81 - State v. McClelland

State v. McClelland’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
6
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably State v. Sprague (2015), 507 So. 2d 558 - Korreckt v. State (1987)

34 state decisions

11019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cady v. Dombrowski · Steele v. United States No. 1 · United States v. Long · State v. Brunner · Walker v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the execution of a search warrant the person executing the same may reasonably detain and search any person in the place at the time: (a) To protect himself from attack, or (b) To prevent the disposal or concealment of any things particularly described in the warrant.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Where, as in this case, probable cause to believe that a drug is kept or concealed on certain described premises is established to the satisfaction of a proper magistrate, the search of a person found on the premises in the execution of a search warrant is not only reasonable, but necessary to secure effective enforcement of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act.” ( 208 Kan. 893, 898 , 494 P.2d 1174, 1178 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.