State v. Schriner’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably State v. Dunn (1988), State v. McDaniel & Owens (1980)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Evans v. United States · State v. Brown · State v. Campbell · State v. Turner · State v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A person is criminally responsible for the conduct of another when either before or during the commission of a crime, and with the intent to promote or assist in the commission of a crime, he intentionally aids or advises the other to commit the crime. To be guilty of aiding and abetting in the commission of a crime, the defendant must wilfully and knowingly associate himself with the unlawful venture and wilfully participate in it as he would in something he wishes to bring about or to make succeed.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The defendant is charged with the crime of first degree murder. The defendant pleads not guilty. To establish this charge, each of tire following claims must be proved: “1. That the defendant intentionally killed Miguel Andrade; “2. That such killing was done with premeditation; “3. That this act occurred on or about the 20th day of June, 2010, in Sedgwick County, Kansas. [[Image here]] “Intentionally means conduct that is purposeful and willful and not accidental. Intentional includes the terms ‘knowing’, ‘willful’, ‘purposeful’ and ‘on purpose.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““. . . There is no testimony in the record that these persons were not harmed. Under the circumstances the trial court did not err in its refusal to submit an instruction on kidnapping in the second degree, as lesser included offenses of kidnapping in the first degree. . . .” (State v. Schriner, supra, 215 Kan. at 91 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.