Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Kan. 865 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2006

20 state decisions

1001974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Schriner · State v. Wilson · State v. Warbritton · State v. Towner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) Criminal damage to property is by means other than by fire or explosive: “(a) Willfully injuring, damaging, mutilating, defacing, destroying, or substantially impairing the use of any property in which another has an interest without the consent of such other person; or “(b) Injuring, damaging, mutilating, defacing, destroying, or substantially impairing the use of any property with intent to injure or defraud an insurer or lienholder. “(2) Criminal damage to property is a class E felony if the property is damaged to the extent of $150 or more. Criminal damage to property is a class A misdemeanor if the property damaged is of the value of less than $150 or is of the value of $150 or more and is damaged to the extent of less than $150.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In charging the jury in a' criminal case, it is the duty of the district court to define the offense charged, stating to the jury the essential elements of the crime, either in the language of the statute or in appropriate and accurate language of the court.” (p. 866.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.