State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 district · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably State v. Esposito (1984), State v. Hauck (1976)
2 district · 50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Masqua · State v. Nading · State v. Jenkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Either the use of force or the use of overbearing fear is a necessary ingredient of the offense of rape. The sexual act must be committed against the will and without the consent of the woman; her resistance must be overcome. Thus it is that the intent with which a marauding male approaches a member of the opposite sex in seeking sexual gratification becomes important. Is it his intent to satisfy his lust at any cost, that is, against the lady’s will and by overcoming her resistance, or is it simply to find an accommodating partner? If the first be his intent, and the sexual act is accomplished by destroying resistance, the statute has been violated. On the other hand, if it be his intent merely to cajole the lady into acquiescence, and he is successful, intercourse is on a mutually enjoyable basis, and rape, it is not. Intent and plan of operation are highly significant; they are relevant to the issue of consent or lack thereof.” (Emphasis added.) 215 Kan. at 909 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[EJvidence of other similar crimes or civil wrongs is admissible when relevant to establish motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity or absence of mistake or accident. “We have been careful to point out, however, that the trial court, in its instructions to the jury as to the purpose for which evidence of other offenses may be considered, must designate with particularity the specific elements to which the evidence may be relevant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Newell“"... the force displayed on similar occasions had a material bearing as to the intent with which the defendant approached the victim in this case, and his plan of procedure should he encounter opposition." (p. 910.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.