Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 La. 40 - State v. Murff

State v. Murff’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably 946 So. 2d 654 - State v. Ordodi (2006), 575 So. 2d 848 - State v. Munoz (1991)

36 state decisions

8019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Truby · State v. Vallery · State v. Ward · State v. Dark · State v. Comeaux

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “instrumentality, which, in the manner used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) Is the indictment or information sufficient to inform the court of the offense being charged in order that the court might properly regulate the evidence sought to be introduced? "(2) Does the indictment or information inform the accused of the nature and cause of the offense with which he is being charged? "(3) Is the indictment or information sufficient on its face to support a plea of former jeopardy in the event there is an attempt to try the defendant more than once for the same offense?”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'“Any person who, having a specific intent to commit a crime, does or omits an act for the purpose of and tending directly toward the accomplishing of his object is guilty of an attempt to commit the offense intended; and it shall be immaterial whether, under the circumstances, he would have actually accomplished his purpose. “Mere preparation to commit a crime shall not be sufficient to constitute an attempt; * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.