215 Md. App. 660 - Keyes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · COLOMIRIS v. Woods · Newton v. State · United Services Automobile Association v. Riley · Douglas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Requirements. — A petition filed under this section shall: (1) be in writing; (2) state in detail the grounds on which the petition is based; (3) describe the newly discovered evidence; (4) contain or be accompanied by a request for hearing if a hearing is sought; and (5) distinguish the newly discovered evidence claimed in the petition from any claims made in prior petitions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(e) Hearing. — (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, the court shall hold a hearing on a petition filed under this section if the petition satisfies the requirements of subsection (b) of this section and a hearing was requested. (2) The court may dismiss a petition without a hearing if the court finds that the petition fails to assert grounds on which relief may be granted.[ 10 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“does not create a substantial or significant possibility that the trial result would have been different.’’ He asserts, without support, that “[tjhere is a significant difference between the result that would have been different with one that merely may have been different.” We disagree that the court used the wrong standard. Although the court did use”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.