Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 MICH 112 - Holmes v. Holmes

Holmes v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2012

3 state decisions

201921193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCoy v. Ferguson · Putnam v. Pere Marquette Railroad · Halsey v. Fulton · Diehl v. Cotts · Lariverre v. Rains

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The possibility of the death of the remaindermen in advance of plaintiff (life tenant) does not prevent them from taking that which in law is a vested remainder.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.