Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1921
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Adlard v. Adlard · Fisher v. Fobes · Waterman v. Seeley · Judd v. Judd · Uhl v. Weiden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is, no doubt, as argued by appellant’s counsel, a natural presumption that a husband, placing his money in the hands of his' wife, to be invested in her name, intends it as a specific provision for her exclusive benefit, yet such a presumption would be unreasonable when a husband, a day laborer, deposits with his wife his daily, weekly, or monthly earnings as he receives them, with a view, as they accumulate, to a permanent investment, leaving such investment to her own judgment, retaining nothing in his own hands, and making no provision for his own future.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nurrie v. Fitzgerald
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.