Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Minn. 565 - Cocker v. Cocker

Cocker v. Cocker’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 1974
most recently cited

2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1974

2 district · 12 state decisions

501943195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chadwick v. Cornish · Perine v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order United Workmen · Madson v. Madson · State Ex Rel. v. M. St. P. S. S. M. Ry. Co. · Kells v. Webster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Regardless of whether Edna Cocker is still a party, we think she had an interest in the event of the issue to which her husband was a party. Should he prevail, she would immediately have an inchoate interest in the property described in the deed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.