Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 N.C. App. 412 - State v. Williams

215 N.C. App. 412 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Buchanan · State v. Barnes · State v. Davis · State v. Nobles · State v. Hipps

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Hargett ... is inconsistent with numerous Supreme Court cases holding that a double jeopardy argument cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. See, e.g., State v. Davis , 364 N.C. 297 , 301, 698 S.E.2d 65 , 67 (2010) ("To the extent defendant relies on constitutional double jeopardy principles, we agree that his argument is not preserved because [c]onstitutional questions not raised and passed on by the trial court will not ordinarily be considered on appeal."). Because we are bound to follow the Supreme Court, we hold that defendant's argument is not preserved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Because we are bound to follow the Supreme Court,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.