¶1 Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
¶2 Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Werner, Chase, Hogan, Miller, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.
215 N.Y. 656
109 N.E 1091
Rice v. . Halsey
Decided May 25, 1915
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1915-05-25
The plaintiff is the widow of one John Smith Rice, and the remainderman of a trust of personal property created by her late husband, who was the life tenant thereof. The defendants are stockbrokers, doing business in the city of New York under the firm name of C. D. Halsey & Co. The trustee of the said trust was John Drohan. He was originally joined as a party defendant, individually and as trustee, but the action as to him was severed.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1915-05-25
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1968
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →