State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he statute requires that force must be used on the victim,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to determine whether, considering the undisputed facts and drawing all reasonable inferences in the state's favor, a reasonable factfinder could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that defendant used physical force on the victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there is evidence that permitted the jury to infer that defendant pulled the purse off the victim's shoulder very quickly because he wanted to prevent any possible resistance by the victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.