Youngker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably State v. Robinson (1980), 551 F. Supp. 1 - Watson v. Nix (1982)
1 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Masi v. United States · 88 So. 2d 918 - Anglin v. Mayo · Markey v. State · Miles v. State · 53 So. 2d 533 - Kilbee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A fraudulent or false representation or pretense within the meaning of F.S. 1963, Section 811.021, F.S.A., is a false representation of a past or existing fact. Green v. State, Fla. App. 1966, 190 So.2d 614, 616 . A promise to do something in the future, even though it be a false promise, is not a representation of a past or existing fact and will not support a conviction for false pretenses. Such was the holding of the Florida Supreme Court in Scarlett v. State, 1889, 25 Fla. 717 , 6 So.2d 767 , under statutory F.S. 1963, Section 811.021, F.S.A., which describes the crime of false pretenses. This rule was reiterated in Morris v. State, 1907, 54 Fla. 80 , 45 So. 456 .” (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n oath may be undertaken by any unequivocal act in the presence of an officer authorized to administer oaths by which the declarant knowingly attests the truth of a statement and assumes the obligation of an oath”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An affidavit is by definition a statement in writing under an oath administered by a duly authorized person....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.