Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 SO2D 747 - Dickinson v. Allen

Dickinson v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1976
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rivers v. Ross · State Ex Rel. Ranger Realty Co. v. Lummus · City of Fort Myers v. Heitman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The sole issue in the suit was whether the changed assessment of plaintiffs’ property was for the purpose of correcting a mistake of omission and/or commission in making the original assessment, or whether it was brought about by a change in judgment on the part of the taxing authorities as to such original valuation. If the former, the assessment change was valid and permissible; if the latter, the change in assessment was invalid and impermissible. “Both the statute law and the applicable Florida cases draw a distinction, as to legal effect, between the two contrasting reasons aforesaid for changing the assessment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.