Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

215 So. 2d 83

Solomon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 1968

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1968-11-04

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1968-11-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

40196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

¶1The appellant, having been found guilty by the jury of robbery and so adjudged guilty and duly sentenced by the court, appealed from the judgment and sentence. We affirm.

¶2The defendant was represented at trial by her retained attorney. No motion for a new trial was made and the appeal was entered by the public defender. It appears that he did so blindly and perfunctorily without any professional evaluations of merits as to any grounds for reversal.

¶3No point argued by the public defender in his brief relates to any adverse ruling made at trial and fundamental error has not been made to appear.

¶4The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

¶5Affirmed.

McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
/215/so2d/83 · .json · Public domain