Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 So. 3d 607 - Bistline v. Rogers

215 So. 3d 607 - Bistline v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer · 455 So. 2d 1026 - White Const. Co., Inc. v. Dupont · 658 So. 2d 518 - Globe Newspaper Co. v. King · 884 So. 2d 990 - Weinstein Design Group, Inc. v. Fielder · 498 So. 2d 859 - American Cyanamid Co. v. Roy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “create[s] a substantive legal right not to be subject to a punitive damages claim and ensuing financial worth discovery until the trial court makes a determination that there is a reasonable evidentiary basis for recovery of punitive damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no claim for punitive damages shall be permitted unless there is a reasonable showing by evidence in the record or proffered by the claimant which would provide a reasonable basis for recovery of such damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he standard for determining whether a claimant has established a 'reasonable basis' for recovery [of punitive damages] is similar to that of whether a claimant has stated a cause of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.