Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

215 S.W.3d 738

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2007

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2007-02-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2009

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Robert Taylor (“Movant”) appeals the motion court of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City’s denial of his post-conviction relief motion, under Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/215/sw3d/738 · .json · Public domain