Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 WIS 613 - Paul v. Smith

Paul v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 1952
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1952

5 state decisions

30193419401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rockwell v. Humphrey · Interior Woodwork Co. v. Buhler · Wilcox v. Coumbe · Smith v. Crosby · Lynch v. Ryan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It was settled in those cases that, in order to sustain such a conveyance as valid, it must be established by clear and satisfactory proof, upon closely scrutinizing the transaction, that the conveyance was voluntary on the part of the mortgagor; based on an adequate consideration; untainted by fraud; made without advantage being taken of the debtor’s necessity to drive a hard bargain; and that there was a discharge of the mortgage indebtedness or at least a binding agreement to consider that indebtedness paid and discharged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.