215 Wis. 2d 45 - State v. Avery’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · 4 Cal. 4th 1233 - People v. Cummings · 201 Wis. 2d 303 - State v. Bentley · 201 Wis. 2d 219 - State v. Sanchez · 118 Wis. 2d 339 - State v. Wickstrom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“district attorney shall advise the court prior to trial if the district attorney intends to use the statement of a codefendant which implicates another defendant in the crime charged. Thereupon, the judge shall grant a severance as to any such defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Court [in Bruton] explained that although the defendant would have the Sixth Amendment right to cross-examine the codefendant, the exercise of that right would be impossible at a joint trial because the codefendant could not be compelled to testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.