Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 215 Wis. 2d 673 - State v. Anderson

215 Wis. 2d 673 - State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably 230 Wis. 2d 324 - State v. Madlock (1999), 2000 WI App 87 - State v. Canady (2000)

26 state decisions

1201997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 208 Wis. 2d 409 - State v. Sweat · 168 Wis. 2d 12 - Winkelman v. Beloit Memorial Hospital · Probst v. Chen · 90 Wis. 2d 690 - Gyldenvand v. Schroeder · 191 Wis. 2d 278 - Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(5) In any case, the restitution order may require that the defendant do one or more of the following: (a) Pay all special damages, but not general damages, substantiated by evidence in the record, which could be recovered in a civil action against the defendant for his or her conduct in the commission of a crime considered at sentencing.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 385 Wis. 2d 120 - State v. Shawn T. Wiskerchen · 385 Wis. 2d 848 - State v. Rychtik
  2. “broadly and liberally in order to allow victims to recover their losses as a result of a defendant's criminal conduct.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 385 Wis. 2d 848 - State v. Rychtik · 230 Wis. 2d 324 - State v. Madlock
  3. “[A] restitution hearing is not the equivalent of a civil trial and does not require strict adherence to the rules of evidence and burden of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 385 Wis. 2d 848 - State v. Rychtik

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.