215 Wis. 2d 696 - State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 147 Wis. 2d 842 - Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander · 198 Wis. 2d 756 - State v. Schmaling · 178 Wis. 2d 729 - State v. Frey · 141 Wis. 2d 535 - State v. O'NEIL
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Whoever with intent to defraud falsely makes or alters a writing or object of any of the following kinds so that it purports to have been made by another, or at another time, or with different provisions, or by authority of one who did not give such authority, is guilty of a Class H felony: (a) A writing or object whereby legal rights or obligations are created, terminated or transferred, or any writing commonly relied upon in business or commercial transactions as evidence of debt or property rights ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state and the conviction, is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“by which legal rights or obligations are created or transferred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.