Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 Ark. 77 - Allen v. Langston

Allen v. Langston’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie · Oliver v. Southern Trust Co. · Dozier v. Ragsdale · Oliver v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. · Tindall v. Searan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But if its (the statute’s) purpose is to accomplish a single object only, and some of its provisions are void, the whole must fail, unless sufficient remains to effect the object without the aid of the invalid portion. And if they are so mutually connected with and dependent on each other, as conditions, considerations, or compensations for each other, as to warrant the belief that the Legislature would not pass the residue independently, then if some parts are unconstitutional, all of the provisions which are thus dependent, conditional, or connected must fall with them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.